WASHINGTON — One year after the Department of Government Efficiency began its campaign to shrink the federal government, the results present a paradox: the largest peacetime workforce reduction in recorded U.S. history paired with federal spending that continued to climb.
DOGE cut a net 242,000 federal positions between January and December 2025, a reduction exceeding 10% of the civilian workforce, according to the Cato Institute. The pace had not been seen since the military demobilizations following World War II and the Korean War. Yet federal outlays through the first 11 months of calendar year 2025 reached $7.6 trillion, roughly $248 billion higher than the same period in 2024.
The disconnect is structural, not incidental. Federal payroll accounts for approximately 10% of total spending. The remaining 90%, dominated by Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and interest on the national debt, runs on autopilot under mandatory spending laws that no executive action can alter. That arithmetic defined DOGE’s ceiling from the start; what it accomplished within those constraints is a matter of fierce debate.
The raw numbers are striking by any historical measure. The federal workforce fell from 3.015 million employees in January 2025 to 2.744 million by November, according to Yahoo Finance, citing Brookings Hamilton Project data. Gross separations reached 271,000 over that period, with a net reduction of 242,000 after accounting for new hires.
Approximately 154,000 employees accepted a deferred resignation offer, according to the Office of Personnel Management. Nearly 60% of the total decline occurred in October, driven by a one-time civil service buyout. The reduction brought federal employment to levels not seen since late 2014, effectively reversing a decade of workforce growth in under 10 months.
Alex Nowrasteh, an analyst at the Cato Institute (a public policy research organization that describes its mission as promoting “individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace”), characterized it as “the largest peacetime workforce cut on record.”
The Department of Defense absorbed the largest raw number of reductions at 61,600 civilian positions, roughly 8% of its workforce. The IRS lost approximately 25% of its staff, prompting the agency’s inspector general to warn of likely disruptions to the 2026 tax filing season. The Department of Health and Human Services shrank from 82,000 to 62,000 full-time employees and closed half of its regional offices. The Social Security Administration planned a 12% staffing reduction and listed 47 field offices for closure, according to the Brookings Institution. USAID was effectively dismantled.
DOGE, initially led by Elon Musk, claimed $214 billion in slashed federal spending as of October 2025, according to the Washington Times. Musk departed after 130 days in May 2025, and the operation continued as a scaled-down, decentralized effort. It never approached the initial $2 trillion spending elimination goal. Analysts across the political spectrum found the claimed savings significantly overstated.
The fiscal year 2025 budget tells the story of a structural mismatch. Total federal spending exceeded $7 trillion, a $301 billion increase over fiscal year 2024, according to Reason. The budget deficit reached $1.8 trillion, with DOGE contributing an estimated $8 billion in deficit reduction.
Eric Boehm, writing for Reason (a media organization dedicated to “free minds and free markets”), laid out the arithmetic. Mandatory entitlement programs increased by $245 billion. Interest on the national debt rose $80 billion. Pentagon spending grew by $38 billion. Veterans Affairs spending increased $41 billion. A 10% workforce cut, by the Cato Institute’s estimate, saves roughly $40 billion annually, a figure that is significant in isolation but modest against a $1.8 trillion deficit.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (a nonpartisan organization that describes itself as “committed to educating the public on issues with significant fiscal policy impact”) estimated that fiscal year 2026 discretionary appropriations total $1.653 trillion annualized, roughly $10 billion above fiscal year 2025 levels. Even with DOGE-enabled workforce savings, mandatory spending growth far outpaced any discretionary reductions.
Federal spending through November 2025 tracked closely with Congressional Budget Office projections, suggesting DOGE had no measurable impact on aggregate outlays. Tax collections did increase by $308 billion, nearly offsetting the spending growth, but those gains stemmed from economic activity rather than DOGE-driven policy.
More than 350,000 workers left the federal payroll during 2025, according to CNN. Many entered what the outplacement industry described as a brutally competitive job market. Employers announced only 507,647 planned hires in 2025, the lowest figure since 2010 and a 34% decline from 2024, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas (a global outplacement and career transition firm).
DOGE-related actions were the leading reason for job cut announcements in 2025, accounting for 293,753 planned layoffs with an additional 20,976 attributed to downstream impacts on contractors and nonprofits, according to the Challenger report. The government sector saw a 703% surge in job cuts compared to 2024.
The geographic concentration of losses created regional economic stress. Virginia alone lost 23,900 federal jobs, wiping out six years of federal employment gains in 11 months, according to VPM, the Virginia Public Media outlet, citing Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Old Dominion University economists warned that the state was on the cusp of recession as of January 2026.
CNN documented individual cases of former workers accumulating tens of thousands of dollars in hospital costs after losing health coverage, relying on food stamps, seeking state utility assistance, and falling behind on mortgage payments. Highly specialized federal employees reported applying to dozens of positions without success months after separation, according to CNBC.
Some displaced workers found new roles through emerging placement programs. Civic Match, a nonprofit platform, connected nearly 200 former federal workers with local government jobs, with 40% placed in human resources or operational roles and 14% in public health or human services positions, according to Smart Cities Dive. The scale of displacement, however, far outpaced available support.
The workforce reductions produced measurable disruptions across multiple federal agencies. The Social Security Administration’s website crashed repeatedly in March, locking millions of users out of their accounts, according to the Washington Post. Research from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that SSA office closures lead to a 13% drop in disability benefit recipients in affected areas.
The National Institutes of Health absorbed $4 billion in funding cuts. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (an organization that describes itself as working to “build a government that is accountable, transparent and ethical”), estimated those cuts alone would eliminate $10 billion in economic activity. University of Maryland and University of Pennsylvania researchers estimated that health research cuts would cause $16 billion in annual economic losses and 68,000 jobs lost, according to CBS News.
The Partnership for Public Service estimated that DOGE actions cost taxpayers $135 billion when accounting for paid leave for tens of thousands of employees, rehiring mistakenly terminated workers, lost productivity, and related disruptions. That estimate did not include the cost of defending multiple lawsuits or lost IRS tax collections from the agency’s reduced enforcement capacity.
DOGE supporters counter that the cuts eliminated genuine waste, broke an entrenched culture of bureaucratic self-preservation, and created accountability mechanisms that did not previously exist. The Washington Times reported that DOGE inspired similar efficiency efforts in more than two dozen states, suggesting the initiative’s cultural impact may outlast its direct fiscal results.
The fundamental question DOGE’s first year exposed is not whether the federal workforce can be cut; it clearly can. The question is whether the political system will confront the mandatory spending programs that constitute roughly two-thirds of the federal budget.
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid combined for a $245 billion spending increase in fiscal year 2025 alone. Interest on the national debt added another $80 billion. These programs operate under permanent statutory authority. No executive order, no efficiency initiative, and no workforce reduction can alter their trajectory. Only Congress holds that power.
The Cato Institute’s assessment was direct: the only path to closing the deficit runs through Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, and defense spending. Reason reached the same conclusion, noting that “cutting ‘silly government contracts and foreign aid’ won’t make a dent in the deficit.”
President Trump pledged during his campaign not to cut Social Security or Medicare. The administration has characterized entitlement reform as “a policy decision that belongs to voters” and Congress. Congress, for its part, possesses all the necessary authority but faces enormous electoral risk in reforming programs that serve tens of millions of Americans.
Some agencies have already begun rehiring workers and increasing spending after the initial DOGE push subsided, according to TIME. The FY2026 budget proposes further cuts but faces congressional resistance. Whether the 2026 midterm elections create political space for structural fiscal reform or punish the disruptions of the past year remains an open question.
DOGE demonstrated that the federal workforce is not untouchable. What it could not demonstrate is that touching it is sufficient.
—
WASHINGTON — FBI agents searched the Virginia home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson on January 14 as part of an Espionage Act investigation...
DENVER — A bill advancing through the Colorado legislature would allow anyone injured during federal immigration enforcement to sue agents in state court, stripping...
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is preparing to issue what legal scholars are calling the most significant separation-of-powers ruling since the steel seizure case...